No more words....

So last night I watched the Larry King interview of George & Cindy Anthony.

While my heart absolutely breaks for them…they need to stay out of the media eye. It’s not good for them – it makes them appear inconsistent and not everyone is sympathetic to their cause of unconditional love. I understand it, and even I get so irritated with their lying for the cause.

Larry didn’t soft shoe this interview so much as his last one, either. George is absolutely the weak link and could provide some valuable information to the case I think. If someone spends some good time talking with him, he clearly is capable of revealing more information than Cindy is. It is absolutely eating this poor guy up – it’s all over his face. And in his words…

Larry asked them straight out if they directly interrogated Casey when she was home on bail:

G. ANTHONY: I talked to my daughter as much as I possibly could. But then again, we never got a chance to really talk to her as much because of the investigation.
C. ANTHONY: She was home. We talked to her.
G. ANTHONY: At different times, but not the way I wanted to sometimes.

And that was said, in a tone that was him suggesting that he wasn’t able to be as firm as he wanted to – we already know Leonard Padilla said everyone walked on eggshells and handled Casey with kid gloves – not even mentioning Caylee’s name while she was home. After George corrected Cindy, they both turned red – and she looked towards their attorney for assistance.

Then there were the Freudian slips by Cindy…..

KING: Do you have any idea why Caylee didn't call police all the time her daughter was missing?
C. ANTHONY: Casey?
KING: I'm sorry. There's so many Cs.
C. ANTHONY: I can't answer that. Casey was probably grieving as best as she could.

Why the need to grieve? Her daughter was missing and with the “sitter” so she said. Why would grieving ever be part of the equasion? Unless of course, she already knew what happened to Caylee. And the only way Casey would know that, would be if she was involved.

Another one, when Larry asked if they believed she wasn’t involved at all.

C. ANTHONY: We don't have proof that she didn't do it, but there's a lot of proof -- or there's a lot of evidence out there that doesn't prove that she's done it.

No proof that she didn’t – to me, speaks volumes over no evidence proving she did. There is no evidence to prove she didn’t – that’s the problem.

My personal advice to George & Cindy is to forgo the crusade to attempt to change their daughter's portrayal in the media. Let the evidence speak for themselves and have the case tried in a court of law.

They’re only making matters worse…