I'm all for the Tea Party coming to Massachusetts.
Taxation without representation is something that we should all be opposed to; and being a purveyor of alcohol -- we feel one of the pains first hand with the recent taxes imposed.
But I'm sorry.....
Sarah Palin is not whom I identify with.
I have some issues with her being the voice at the Party.
It's not that she's a Republican, because clearly I don't have issue with that. It's her. Almost everything about her rubs me the wrong way. So much so that even when she's on point with her comments, I can't even hear what she's saying because I'm already put off.
I'd have much preferred almost anyone else to be here and speak out.
Thoughts?
3 comments:
I would much prefer Ron Paul, myself. He's articulate, low-key, and actually has a chance at converting some folks, whereas Palin - although this may be unfair - is seen as a lipsticked buffoon by far too many to be effective. Paul has a track record, in Congress, of consistently voting against tax increases, whereas Palin... eh.
I'm with you ... like the ideas behind the movement but don't like the voice of the movement. I am over her. She is overexposed, and I wish she would go away.
Ugh, she is totally overexposed and I am so with you on going away.
Suldog -- I almost threw Ron Paul's name out there! LOL. He would've been a far better choice. Agreed...
Post a Comment